The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (two million won of fine) is too unreasonable.

2. Although the defendant is a primary offender, in light of the purpose of the Juvenile Protection Act that intends to protect the juvenile from a harmful environment, there is a need to strictly punish the act of employing the juvenile in the entertainment tavern in light of the legislative intent of the Juvenile Protection Act, and the defendant has employed the juvenile E and F as an employee and has failed to make efforts to confirm his age (the defendant confirmed the F's student card entered in the school year and school number, and the E and F's resident registration certificate did not have been confirmed), and other factors such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, family environment, circumstances leading to the instant crime, and conditions of sentencing specified in the arguments of this case including the circumstances before and after the instant crime are considered, even if the court below's punishment is unreasonable.

3. According to the conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.