1. The defendant shall pay KRW 1,791,783 to the plaintiff.

2. The plaintiff's remaining claims are dismissed.

3. Of the costs of lawsuit.

1. Basic facts

A. The Seoul Regional Tax Office, while conducting a tax investigation with respect to Bsanbu and C, deemed the Plaintiff operating Bsanbu and Cheongbu as a related person from May 31, 201 to October 2, 201, and conducted an integrated investigation with respect to the Plaintiff as the investigation period from 2007 to 2010.

B. On December 1, 201, the director of the tax office of distribution notified the Plaintiff of the rectification of global income tax of KRW 33,905,120 (including additional taxes), global income tax of KRW 110,474,410 (including additional taxes), global income tax of KRW 87,042,860 (including additional taxes) in 2008, global income tax of KRW 87,042,860 (including additional taxes), global income tax of KRW 81,838,910 (including additional taxes) in 2010.

C. The Plaintiff paid KRW 33,905,120 of global income tax in 2007 and KRW 110,474,410 of global income tax in 2008 as of July 16, 2012, and paid KRW 6,122,390 of global income tax in 2009 as of January 2, 2012, KRW 55,545,470 on July 16, 2012, and KRW 81,838,910 of global income tax in 2010 as of January 1, 2012.

On the other hand, the Plaintiff was dissatisfied with the disposition of imposition of global income tax by the head of the tax office on January 16, 2012. However, on May 22, 2012, the Plaintiff was dismissed by the Tax Tribunal.

In addition, on May 25, 2012, a lawsuit was filed against the director of the tax office to revoke the disposition, including global income tax, seeking the revocation of the disposition (hereinafter “instant administrative litigation”) and the judgment dismissing the Plaintiff on December 13, 2013 was rendered in the first instance court.

(Seoul Administrative Court 2012Guhap16978). Thereafter, the Plaintiff appealed against the judgment of the first instance court. The appellate court did not have participated in the Plaintiff’s receipt of rebates, etc., and on the grounds that the Plaintiff was erroneous in calculating the omission amount in cash sales, etc., the Plaintiff’s global income tax is KRW 48,079,279,271, 209, KRW 79,817,617, and KRW 79,817,619, and KRW 2007 among the disposition of imposition of global income tax of the director of the tax office of distribution.