1. The Defendant’s KRW 274,408,00 for the Plaintiff and 6% per annum from March 18, 2017 to April 12, 2017.

Basic Facts

On January 2010, Seoul Qro entered into a lease contract between the Seoul Mcro and the Sung Mcro General Management Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the “Scro”), the contract amount was 3,795,246,000 won (including value-added tax; hereinafter the same shall apply; hereinafter) for the 3,795,246,000 square meters for the 1/84 equal division of the contract amount into 1/84 (3,795,246,000 x 1/84 x 1/84) and the lease contract between Jan. 28, 2010 to Apr. 27, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the “Scro”) and the Sung Pcro General Management Co., Ltd., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the “Scro General”), and the lease contract was leased to Nonparty 2 for a period of 45,181,500 won (the lease contract of this case was made from Oct. 27, 20108.

The period of lease of the existing lease agreement between the non-party company and the non-party company around April 201 is set as is, and the contract area is 308.91 square meters from 331 square meters to 308.91 square meters, the contract amount is 3,89,464,667 won from 3,795,246,00 won to 3,899,667 won, and the monthly rent is 104,218,667 won, which is the difference between the existing contract amount and the increased contract amount, is about 74 months from March 1, 2011 to April 27, 2017.

46,589,860 won (=45,181,500 won 104,218,667 won x 1/74) which reflects the amount of equal division per one of the above-mentioned items (i.e., 813,267,00 won x 1/74). A modified contract was concluded to change the contents of the deposit from 813,267,00 won to 838,617,480 won (hereinafter “instant lease contract”).

The non-party company, including the conclusion of the consignment operation contract between the defendant and the non-party company, established several stores in the waiting room of this case leased from the Seoul Meart, and on April 18, 2013, the non-party company occupied and used for profit by the defendant, and the non-party company possessed and used for profit by the non-party company 36 square meters of one store among the above stores (hereinafter "the above store of this case"), and sold goods designated by the non-party company, but the defendant is non-party.