Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and six months.

Of the facts charged in the instant case, against D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, and M respectively.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal record] The Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor on April 19, 2016, Cheongju District Court 2014 Goju District Court 1730, Goju District Court 1730, and was sentenced to dismissal on January 19, 2017 by the prosecutor’s appeal under the same court 2016No435, Jan. 19, 2017. The Defendant was dismissed on March 10, 2017 by the Supreme Court 2017Mo416, and the said appellate court’s ruling became final and conclusive on March 10, 2017, which was the date of the said decision.

[Criminal facts] 2016 Highest 2115

1. On January 18, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around early January 18, 2016, at the P cafeteria operated by the Victim Co., Ltd. Co., Ltd., Ltd., Ltd., N in Nam-si, Nam-si, Nam-si, the Defendant would receive a decoration processed by PO and sell it on behalf of the Internet and sell it on behalf of the Defendant.

“Falsely speaking: (a) the Plaintiff sent R’s business registration certificate and the Policy of Guarantee on Sales of Goods amounting to KRW 15 million to said Q to a mobile phone message on January 18, 2016; and (b) contact the said Q with the said Q on the phone at an irregular place on January 18, 2016, and (c) pay the price up to February 15, 2016 if the Plaintiff delivered 1,50 factorings to R, which it operates, to guarantee payment as the Policy of Guarantee on Sales of Goods.

“A false statement was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, in fact, the Defendant did not operate R at the time and received the above decoration from the third party, and distributed it to the third party, and did not have the intent or ability to secure the price of the goods of the R. The Defendant operated another meat processing company, but did not pay approximately KRW 400 million for employees due to the aggravation of management. As such, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to pay the price of the goods even if he was provided with the above decoration from the injured party, even if he was provided with it, because the auction procedure for the housing, etc. is difficult to raise the cost of living.

The defendant is provided with lessons equivalent to KRW 7,573,500 at the market price on the same day by deceiving the victim.