A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 1, 2011, the criminal defendant against the victim B was introduced by the victim B, who operated the original breeding house in the name of "E farm" from Gyeong-gun, Gyeong-gun, Gyeongbuk-gun, and then was called the victim's telephone and the victim's telephone and the "B Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y

It is intended to supply the down payment at the face of the week and the original pathology.

“The purpose was to make a false statement.”

However, there was no fact that the defendant operated original pathology, and there was no intention or ability to deliver the original pathology to the victim.

Defendant deceiving the victim as above and received KRW 15 million in total, including KRW 5 million around March 3, 201 and KRW 18 million around March 18, 201, from the victim as contract deposit.

2. On June 2012, the criminal defendant against the victim G would give the victim G a profit of KRW 70 million per 1stma, if he/she processed the fry of the fry with his/her fry as a decoration and sold the fry of the fry to his/her fry in Seocho-si farm located in Seocho-si, Seocho-si. If he/she invested KRW 45 million, he/she would sell the fry of KRW 500,00,000 from selling the fry of KRW 35 million every ten days.

“The purpose of “ was to make a false representation.”

However, even if the amount of investment is paid from the injured party, there was no intention or ability to sell the original product as a decoration and to deliver the proceeds.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above and was given cash KRW 45 million to the injured party.

3. Fraud against victim H;

A. On September 15, 2012, the Defendant, at around September 15, 2012, would pay the victim the amount equivalent to KRW 1,00,000 per month to the victim at the J office of the management of the victim H located in Seo-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seoul.

“The purpose of “ was to make a false representation.”

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to pay vehicle sirens to the victim.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above, and vice versa from the victim.