beta
Text
1. Between the Plaintiff and the Defendants, the Switzerland Construction Co., Ltd. support the Daegu District Court racing on January 28, 2016.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. Defendant Hyundai Port Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Hyundai Port”) was awarded a contract for manufacturing steel structures from Poco Construction (hereinafter “Poco Construction”) and produced and supplied steel structures.
B. The Plaintiff, the Defendant Co., Ltd., Co., Ltd., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Co., Ltd”), the Defendant Co., Ltd.’s Korean office (hereinafter “Defendant Co., Ltd.”), the Defendant Co., Ltd.’s member industry leader (hereinafter “Defendant Co., Ltd.”), the Defendant Co., Ltd., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Co., Ltd”), the Defendant Co., Ltd., Ltd., (hereinafter “Defendant Co., Ltd”), the Defendant Co., Ltd., Ltd., (hereinafter “Defendant Co., Ltd.”) was awarded a contract for the manufacture of steel structure, supply of related materials, or transportation from the Defendant Co., Ltd.
C. On May 7, 2015, the Plaintiff owned a claim for the purchase price of KRW 41,064,606 against Defendant Hyundai Port. However, on May 7, 2015, Defendant Hyundai Port transferred the Plaintiff a claim for the purchase price of KRW 41,064,606 among the purchase price claims against Defendant Hyundai Port for the payment of the above purchase price claim (hereinafter “transfer of claim”) to the Plaintiff. The notice of assignment of claim reached the Port Construction on May 8, 2015.
Poco Construction is the product price to be paid to Defendant Hyundai Port in KRW 33,705,30,00, and the assignment of claims, seizure of claims, and provisional seizure are concurrent with the above price, and it is not clear whether the validity of the assignment of claims to the assignee of claims is valid or not, on January 28, 2016, combined deposit was made by mixing the amount of KRW 33,705,30,00 with the Daegu District Court Seogu District Court 107, No. 207, 2016, stating the latter part of Article 487 of the Civil Act and Article 248(1
(hereinafter “the deposit of this case”) e.
The details of the deposited parties and executing creditors who reported the instant deposit by the Spanco Construction as to the instant deposit are as follows.
(2) the amount of the annual deposit.