A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal record] On July 24, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to three years of imprisonment due to a violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (special rape) in the application of the Gwangju District Court’s Magpoon on April 22, 2017, and completed the execution of the sentence.

[2018 Highest 847] On July 24, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to an order to attach an electronic tracking device for three years and ten years (hereinafter “electronic device”) on April 22, 2017 after having been sentenced to an order to attach an electronic tracking device for a location of three years and ten years (hereinafter “electronic device”) with respect to a violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (special rape) in the Gwangju District Court’s Support for the Manan District Court on July 24, 2014. The Defendant shall not be obliged to attach an electronic device to a person with an electronic device, who is equipped with the electronic device, to make the device effective by means of

Nevertheless, on August 11, 2018, the period of attachment of an electronic device was around 00:22, the Defendant damaged the upper gate, which, under the influence of alcohol, fixed the boops attached to the Defendant’s scood by using the pentf in the house, on the ground that the electronic device was locked.

Accordingly, the defendant has harmed the utility of the electronic device by arbitrarily separating and damaging the electronic device from his body during the period of attachment of the electronic device.

[2018 Highest 952] The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving D's joint cars.

On October 4, 2018, the Defendant driving the F store in front of the “F store” located in Simpo City E, on October 4, 2018, and made the left turn to the left from the “G bank” page to the “ Artificial breadth.”

Since there is a remote crossing with a signal apparatus, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents by safely driving a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle in accordance with the signals, and by checking the front, rear and left well.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and neglected to turn to the left and violated the signal.