Defendant

A and B shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the Defendants did not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendants and the defendants D above-mentioned defendant 1 of 2015 are separated from pleadings. They are people who became aware of each other while treating alcohol addiction.

1. The Defendants’ co-principal

A. On July 24, 2014, around 21:10, the Defendants were indicated as “victim I,” but according to the witness examination protocol with respect to J, the Defendants at the time GJ clubs’s operator was F, so the victims of the crime of interference with business seem to be F.

Within the “Gnaby club” operated, Defendant A was off and frighted with D and fighting with each other, and Defendant B was unable to get out of the place of business, and three other customers were frighted for about one hour, such as getting out of the place of business, and getting out of the place of business by singing.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired with D and interfered with the victim's main business by force.

B. The Defendants did not have any intent or ability to pay the drinking value due to the lack of cash possessed by themselves, even though they ordered alcoholic beverages and liquors at D, the above date, time, and place.

Nevertheless, the Defendants were provided with alcoholic beverages and alcoholic beverages equivalent to 48,00 won at the market price owned by the injured Party F with D and its affiliated main employees.

As a result, the Defendants conspired with D to receive the victim's property by deceiving the main employee.

2. Defendant A’s property damage is indicated as “victim I,” but according to the witness examination protocol with respect to H, Defendant A’s property damage is indicated as “victim I,” without any particular reason at the above date, time, and place. However, according to the witness examination protocol with respect to H, the microowner appears to be H.

One radio microphone equivalent to 80,000 won in the market value was thrown out once on the wall surface and damaged once on the wall surface.

As a result, Defendant A damaged the victim's property and harmed its utility.

The Defendants of "2015, 35" are the Defendants on July 7, 2014.