Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant B and C Separation of Pleadings

c. people who have become aware of each other while treating and alcohol addiction.

1. On July 24, 2014, around July 24, 2014, the Defendant was indicated as “victim F,” but according to the witness examination protocol regarding G, the Defendant’s interference with business was indicated as “A,” and thus, the victim of the crime of interference with business appears to be E.

In this operation, the Defendant exceeded, and fighted with B, and fighting with each other, and C was unable for about one hour, for customers who were in the place of business to get out of the place of business, and three other customers are not allowed to enter the place of business by singing, etc.

Accordingly, the defendant conspireds with B and C to interfere with the victim's main business by force.

2. The Defendant was ordered to provide alcoholic beverages and alcoholic beverages at the time, date, time, and place above, but there was no intention or ability to pay the alcohol value due to the lack of cash possessed by the Defendant.

Nevertheless, the Defendant was provided with alcoholic beverages and alcoholic beverages equivalent to 48,00 won at the market price owned by the victim E by B, C, and its affiliated main employees.

Accordingly, the defendant received the property of the victim by deceiving the main employee in collusion with B and C.

2. On July 26, 2014, at around 01:40 on July 26, 2014, the Defendant damaged public goods, the Defendant: (a) sounded, within 3 rooms of the cell room of the Sung-gun Police Station in Seongbuk-gun, Sung-gun, Seongbuk-gun, 1, 31-ro, Seongbuk-gun, 31, “Is to promptly conduct an investigation; (b) Hasing away from her inside the cell; and (c) destroyed the toilet entrance in the cell by hand, and then, (d) the amount of KRW 150,000 for repair cost per hand.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the use of goods by public offices, thereby harming their utility.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police interrogation protocol of the accused, B, and C;

1. Statement of the police officer with I