The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal did not inflict an injury on the victim even though the defendant committed an assault in the course of wrapping him with the victim;

Rather, in light of the contents of the written application of the victim's wife who returned to the place where the victim had been suffering from speculation, there is sufficient possibility that the victim sustained an injury by the third party during the process of drinking alcohol and returning to the house.

2. Comprehensively taking into account the evidence duly admitted and examined by the lower court, the following circumstances, i.e., victim C from the police investigation to the lower court’s trial.

In light of the fact that the defendant and his wife consistently stated that he suffered from an injury to the sacriffy, and that he consistently made the above statement, the contents of the injury diagnosis statement correspond to the above statement, ② the defendant also recognized the facts of assaulting the victim's face, ③ each written application (Evidence Nos. 38, 84) prepared by the victim and his wife (Evidence Nos. 38, 84) contain the contents that "the victim was sacrified and returned home." However, at the time of returning home, the victim was physically sacrifed, and the victim made a statement to the effect that he was only sacriffy inside the snow samples in the court below, and that the above written statement was merely an exaggeration of part of the damaged part of the victim's face, ④ the victim's entire statement can not be rejected, ④ the victim's sacriffy cannot be found to have been discovered from the victim's victim's victim's victim's victim's victim's victim's victim's fight, ⑤ the victim's relationship with G.