School Foundation Sung Pung University (Attorney Kim Ho-ho, Counsel for the plaintiff-appellant)

Head of Yeongdeungpo-gu

July 7, 2005

Suwon District Court Decision 2004Guhap2302 Delivered on October 6, 2004

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the defendant.

1. Purport of claim

Defendant:

(a) Local education tax; 1,020,30 won or more of the 1998; 2, 1,020,30 won or more of the 194; 2, 1,000 won or more of the 1998; 4, 2,000 won or more of the 1999; 3,00 won or more of the 1,063, 41,00 won of the 2,3,000 local education tax; 4, 5,710,710 won of the 1999; 4, 2,000 won of the 2,47, 3, 1,000 won of the 2,304, 1,000 won of the 2,304, 3, 46, 49, 1, 49, 49, 49, 536, 5, 946, 2, 37, 197

B. Property tax of 2,189,480 won for the year 2003 against the plaintiff on July 2, 2003, urban planning tax of 1,459,650 won, common facilities tax of 1,14,720 won, and local education tax of 437,890 won for the year 203;

C. 6,083,370 won for a regular aggregate land tax of 2003, urban planning tax of 2,561,120 won, local education tax of 1,216,670 won, and special rural development tax of 431,820 won for the plaintiff on October 29, 2003

Each disposition shall be revoked.

2. Purport of appeal

The part against the defendant in the judgment of the first instance shall be revoked, and the plaintiff's claim corresponding to the revoked part shall be dismissed.

1. Quotation of the reasons for the judgment of the first instance;

The reasoning of the judgment of the court on this case is that the remaining part of the judgment of the court of first instance, excluding the claim(c) and the claim(c) of this case, is identical to that of the other part of the judgment (the court of first instance rendered a judgment dismissing the claim(c) of the court of first instance, and the original and the defendant made a final judgment dismissing the claim(c) of the court of first instance, and the claim(c) of which the defendant made an appeal, shall be cited as it is in accordance with

2. Conclusion

Therefore, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.

Judges Hong Sung-hee (Presiding Judge)