Of the facts charged in the instant case, the fact that the private document was cited, the fact that the private document was held, and the fact that the private document was held, respectively, related to No. 110.

1. Facts charged 【2014 high-ranking 2522】

A. The Defendant is the South-North Dong of G, while H is the husband of G, and I is the father of G, and I is the father of G.

H filed a lawsuit against the Defendant, G, and I at around 2012, such as the cancellation of ownership transfer registration under the 36671 group of 2012 Kuyang-gu District Court 2012, the Defendant had been willing to prepare and submit a written answer in G name at will.

(1) On October 30, 2012, the Defendant: (a) drafted a written response to the said lawsuit; (b) stated the Defendant at the end of the document as the Defendant; and (c) checked the name of G on the next page; and (d) had arbitrarily inscribed it.

G’s seal was affixed.

Accordingly, the Defendant forged one copy of the reply in the name of G, which is a private document on the rights and obligations, and at that time, submitted and used as if it had been duly formed to the staff of the High Government Branch of G, who was unaware of the forged fact.

Shebly, at around January 17, 2013, the Defendant prepared a written response to the said lawsuit, and entered at the end of the document as the Defendant, and had the name of G in the next page, and had the same arbitrarily inscribed thereon.

G’s seal was affixed.

Accordingly, the Defendant forged one copy of the reply in the name of G, which is a private document on the rights and obligations, and at that time, submitted and used as if it had been duly formed to the staff of the High Government Branch of G, who was unaware of the forged fact.

Article 22(1) of the Civil Procedure Act provides that the Defendant shall prepare a written response to the said lawsuit, and shall be written at the end of the document, and shall be written at the end of the document, and the name of G shall be challenged, and the Defendant shall be written at his own discretion on the next day.

G’s seal was affixed.

Accordingly, the Defendant forged one copy of the reply in the name of G, which is a private document on the rights and obligations, and at that time, submitted and used as if it had been duly formed to the staff of the High Government Branch of G, who was unaware of the forged fact.

x. Applicant.