Defendant shall be punished by a fine not exceeding one million won.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant was under criminal trial for the injury of the defendant's wife C due to a high-level case number 2013 high-level 1602.

1. On December 15, 2013, the Defendant forged a private document: (a) on the part of Goyang-gu Office No. 106-dong No. 1003, Goyang-gu, Goyang-si, Goyang-si, the Defendant: (b) on December 15, 2013, as the title “Seman E in connection with the foregoing case”, “I would like to e influenciate a disposition against Seman in favor of the Defendant. It was written and signed as “(b) E in terms of carbon cause.”

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged one of the applications in the name of E, a private document concerning a certificate of fact.

2. At around 15:00 on December 16, 2013, the Defendant: (a) submitted to the public official in charge of receipt, who was unable to identify the place of the instant investigation document, a copy of the written application, which was prepared at the public service center of the Seoul-dong Government District Court, Seoyang-gu, Jung-gu, Busan-si; and (b) submitted to the public official in charge of receipt who was unable to identify the place

Summary of Evidence

1. Part of the protocol concerning the examination of the suspect against the defendant in the prosecution;

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a criminal report (a judgment in a criminal case) (a) the fact that the defendant prepared a written application under the name of the mother and obtained consent from the wife or the mother, and that the wife submitted the first application in the relevant criminal case, but did not withdraw the divorce lawsuit, and that the defendant entered his/her mother-friendly phone number in the first application for the wife, not the telephone number, can be said to have proved that there was no consent from the name holder)

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 231 and 234 of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

1. Articles 37, 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act to increase concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70 of the Criminal Act for the Detention of Labor House Head.