logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2016.12.22 2016고정546
범인도피
Text

Defendant

A and C shall be punished by a fine of 2,000,000 won, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 1,500,000 won.

The Defendants respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

E is a person driving a FF-learning car.

E On January 22, 2016, at around 23:30, while under the influence of alcohol, driving the said car with 0.121% alcohol concentration, and driving the said car to the direction of the science park distance on the side of the Gyeyang-gu National Meteorological Administration, the Daejeon Regional Meteorological Administration, which is located in the Daejeon Pung-gu University, was driving the said car, toward the direction of the science park distance.

During that period, E was in front of the passenger car by negligence due to the negligence of neglecting the front-time city while under the influence of alcohol and received the back portion of the victim Hi 30 driver's left-hand side of the passenger car.

By doing so, E did not take necessary on-site measures even though it damages the amount equivalent to KRW 5,104,90, such as the exchange of back-of-life vehicles, and escaped without leaving the Defendant’s vehicle alone.

Defendant

A, after having arrived at the accident scene as a towing driver at the above time and at the above site, he heard a fluorial fluore with the victim G of the accident, and tried to receive part of the payment by putting Defendant C and Defendant B together with Defendant C and Defendant B.

Accordingly, Defendant A contact with Defendant C and B to inform him of the direction of escape of E, and Defendant C and Defendant B discovered the escape E and boarded Defendant C’s vehicle to get on the vehicle of Defendant C, and have approximately KRW 1 hour back to the end of the World War.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to flee E which caused a traffic accident.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each legal statement of witness E;

1. The witness G’s legal statement (as to the defendant B)

1. Protocol of examination of the witness in relation to the G of this Court (defendant A and C)

1. The actual condition survey report, the report on detection of a de facto driver, and the circumstantial statement of a de facto driver;

1. Application of the written estimate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 151 (1) and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69 of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse.

arrow