Text
Defendant
A and C shall be punished by a fine of 2,000,000 won, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 1,500,000 won.
The Defendants respectively.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
E is a person driving a FF-learning car.
E On January 22, 2016, at around 23:30, while under the influence of alcohol, driving the said car with 0.121% alcohol concentration, and driving the said car to the direction of the science park distance on the side of the Gyeyang-gu National Meteorological Administration, the Daejeon Regional Meteorological Administration, which is located in the Daejeon Pung-gu University, was driving the said car, toward the direction of the science park distance.
During that period, E was in front of the passenger car by negligence due to the negligence of neglecting the front-time city while under the influence of alcohol and received the back portion of the victim Hi 30 driver's left-hand side of the passenger car.
By doing so, E did not take necessary on-site measures even though it damages the amount equivalent to KRW 5,104,90, such as the exchange of back-of-life vehicles, and escaped without leaving the Defendant’s vehicle alone.
Defendant
A, after having arrived at the accident scene as a towing driver at the above time and at the above site, he heard a fluorial fluore with the victim G of the accident, and tried to receive part of the payment by putting Defendant C and Defendant B together with Defendant C and Defendant B.
Accordingly, Defendant A contact with Defendant C and B to inform him of the direction of escape of E, and Defendant C and Defendant B discovered the escape E and boarded Defendant C’s vehicle to get on the vehicle of Defendant C, and have approximately KRW 1 hour back to the end of the World War.
As a result, the Defendants conspired to flee E which caused a traffic accident.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendants’ respective legal statements
1. Each legal statement of witness E;
1. The witness G’s legal statement (as to the defendant B)
1. Protocol of examination of the witness in relation to the G of this Court (defendant A and C)
1. The actual condition survey report, the report on detection of a de facto driver, and the circumstantial statement of a de facto driver;
1. Application of the written estimate statutes;
1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 151 (1) and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;
1. Articles 70(1) and 69 of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse.