1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Plaintiff A”) is a corporation that operates a business, such as the development and sale of a smartphone display system (the so-called “MM”) and Plaintiff B is the representative director of Plaintiff A.

B. The Plaintiff A, around June 11, 2013, owns the information on the control of drinking alcohol driving (hereinafter “C”) around June 1, 2013 (hereinafter “the instant app”).

(2) The instant app is designed to provide information on drinking driving control by allowing users to register a drinking driving control point in real time and share it with other users in the instant app market operated by the Gugle Korea, etc.

C. On October 14, 2013, some press, such as TV sets, pointed out the problems that the instant app users may be abused by allowing them to avoid the crackdown on drunk driving, etc. (hereinafter “the Defendant”) and thus, the National Police Agency affiliated with the Defendant (hereinafter “Defendant”) sent the instant app to the European Korea and the operators of NAV, who operated the website of the instant site of the instant website (hereinafter “the instant website”) around October 14, 2013, with the following written statements (hereinafter “the instant public text”).

The instant app, “P,” traffic information, etc., registered in the apptotop, which is managed by your company, provide the police past or current drinking control location information to the users in real time.

This is.