1. The plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Plaintiff A”) is a corporation that operates the development, sale, etc. of the smartphone display system (the so-called “MM”) while Plaintiff B is the representative director of Defendant A.

B. On June 11, 2013, Plaintiff A (hereinafter “the instant app”) used the “C” app (hereinafter “the instant app”) that shares information on the control of drinking alcohol driving around June 11, 2013.

(2) The instant app calls, which were developed and operated by the Guogle Korea, began to provide services to enable smartphone users to download and use the instant app. 2) The instant app calls, when the smartphone users download and implement it, appear at the present location of the executor and the point of drinking control in the vicinity. Such drinking control information would allow the instant app users to register the point of real-time control and enable other users to share it.

C. On October 14, 2013, some media, such as TV sets, pointed out the problems that the instant app could be misused for drinking driving by allowing users to avoid drinking control. 2) The Defendant’s National Police Agency sent the instant app to the Gugle Korea and its operators under the title of “business request” under the title of “business request” (hereinafter “the instant public text”).

The official text of this case

2. Of the instant app and music control traffic information, etc., among the instant app and music control numbers registered in the app format that are managed by your company, you are providing the police past or current drinking control location information to the users in real time.

This is drinking.