logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2013.12.20 2013고정1124
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant of the Special Act on the Settlement of Traffic Accidents is a person who is engaged in driving with Burle Patom car.

On September 25, 2012, 01:20, the two-lanes were changed from the two-lanes to the three-lanes in order to proceed to the right way to the right way to the right way to the right way to the right way to the right of way to the right of way at the Ulsan-gun Office.

In this case, there was a duty of care to inform the direction change in advance and to change the lanes safely by taking into account the traffic situation of the front and rear left.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and got a part of the DNA passenger car driving by the victim C (the 45 years of age and inn) who was going directly from the latter at the time of the change of course from the two lanes to the third two lanes as the right side of the vehicle being driven by the victim.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim C, such as catitis, which requires approximately four weeks of medical treatment due to occupational negligence as above.

2. When the act under the preceding paragraph is committed, the Defendant destroyed another person’s property equivalent to KRW 546,516 of the repair cost of the damaged vehicle, such as the exchange of the damaged vehicle to the left-hand end of the damaged vehicle.

3. On September 25, 2012, the Defendant was prohibited from driving a motor vehicle on the road not covered by mandatory insurance for violating the Automobile Loss Guarantee Act, but operated a motor vehicle which is not mandatory insurance, such as driving a vehicle with approximately KRW 300 meters from the front of the presidential park located in the Ulsan-gu office-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-si

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. C’s statement;

1. The actual survey report and the accident site photograph;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a written diagnosis and estimate;

1. Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts.

arrow