logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.02.10 2016고단7832
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months and by a fine for 5,00,000 won.

The defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant, while operating a hotel with the trade name of "F" in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, employed a female employee G, and had G engage in the act of similarity, such as receiving money from a male guest H on June 17, 2016, while engaging in sexual traffic intermediary business in the method of similarity, he/she received 80,000 won from the above F 302 male guest H on a commercial name, and received 80,000 won from the above F 302 male guest H on his/her behalf.

Accordingly, the Defendant arranged sexual traffic for business from June 10, 2016 to June 17, 2016.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol concerning each police suspect examination of I, G, or H;

1. An explanatory note;

1. Protocols of seizure and list of seized articles and photographs thereof;

1. Application of business registration certificate, certificate of business report Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging, etc. Sexual Traffic concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of a sentence of imprisonment with prison labor and the concurrent imposition of fines (Article 24 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic);

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for the order of provisional payment are the criminal records of a fine of the same kind once, and the method and form of the crime in this case, the period and scale of the crime in this case, the age of the defendant, sexual conduct, family environment, and circumstances before and after the crime are determined by comprehensively taking account of the sentencing conditions as shown in the arguments.

The acquittal portion

1. The summary of this part of the facts charged is as follows: (a) the Defendant’s management of the F’s “F” in the instant indictment, engaging in engaging in commercial sex acts by engaging in business from October 10, 2014 to June 9, 2016, as indicated in its reasoning.

2. The fact that the Defendant, on October 2014, took over and operated in the name of the above woman I at around the time, is recognized as having been operated.

arrow