Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is the owner of a benz vehicle B.

No automobile which is not covered by mandatory insurance shall be operated on a road.

Nevertheless, the Defendant:

1. On April 12, 2012, at around 19:14, the above vehicle that was not covered by mandatory insurance on the road near the 255-119 Mamp-dong Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 255-119, is operated;

2. On May 8, 2012: Around 03:13, the vehicle is operated not covered by mandatory insurance on the roads near the World Cup stadium, Mapo-dong, Mapo-gu, Seoul Metropolitan Government on May 8, 2012;

3. On July 31, 2012, the vehicle is operated without mandatory insurance on the roads near the mountain village park in the Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seosan-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-do;

4. On November 21, 2012, operation of the above vehicle that was not covered by mandatory insurance on the roads near D located in Yangju-si, Yangju-si, and:

5. On November 27, 2012, at around 13:06, the vehicle is operated without mandatory insurance on the road near the tunnel of Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government at around 135-21, Dong-dong;

6. On May 27, 2013, around 00:13, the operator operated the said vehicle not covered by mandatory insurance on the road near F in the Goyang city E.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Inquiry into non-insurance operation vehicles, inquiry into mandatory insurance contracts, and application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the original register of motor vehicle registration;

1. Article 46 (2) 2 of the relevant Act and the main sentence of Article 8 of the former Guarantee of Compensation for Automobile Damages (amended by Act No. 12987, Jan. 6, 2015) for the crime-related facts, as well as the former Guarantee of Compensation for Damages of Motor Vehicles (amended by Act No. 12987, Jan. 6

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act recognizes and reflects each of the instant offenses. However, the period for which the Defendant did not subscribe to mandatory insurance has considerably long from March 14, 2012 to June 20, 2013, there are many records of punishment that the Defendant had been punished prior to each of the instant offenses, and the Defendant was on January 27, 2013.