logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2017.12.15 2017나108088
구상금
Text

1. All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.

Purport of claim and appeal

1.

Reasons

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. Facts of recognition 1) The Plaintiff is the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act (hereinafter “Industrial Accident Insurance Act”).

(1) A public corporation entrusted with the industrial accident compensation insurance business by the Minister of Employment and Labor, and the non-party B (hereinafter referred to as the “victim”).

Defendant A is a person who suffers the following accidents, and Defendant A is a metro truck (hereinafter referred to as “fluor vehicle”).

The Korean Federation of Trucking Transport Services (hereinafter referred to as the “Defendant Federation”) is the driver and owner of the business.

(2) On November 12, 2013, the Defendant A driven a sea-going vehicle and transported construction materials, such as sewage pipes, to a warehouse in the Hanyang-gun, Hanyang-gun, Hancheon-gun, Chungcheongnam-do on November 12, 2013.

At that time, two sewage pipes equivalent to about 8kg, which were actually loaded on the ship, fall into the steering wheel, and the victim, who was living on the front side of the vehicle at the time, was faced with the finger from the two right side of the sewage pipe that was fallen (hereinafter “instant accident”).

Due to the accident in this case, the victim suffered from the injury of the victim, such as the finger-out frame, etc., among the right side.

3) From November 12, 2013 to December 3, 2013, 2013, the victim was hospitalized at the D’s clinic. From the following day to May 31, 2014, the victim was hospitalized at the D’s hospital. The Plaintiff paid insurance benefits of KRW 23,943,150,00, including the sum of KRW 9,198,000, medical care benefits, 3,688,330, disability benefits, and KRW 10,17,80, to the victim, who is an employee of Korea, the insured corporation, until December 16, 2014.

【Fact-finding without a dispute over the grounds for recognition, Gap’s 1 through 3, 6(including additional numbers), Eul’s 1 and 2, and the purport of the whole pleadings

(b) the Defendant A, the driver and owner of the vehicle that caused the occurrence of liability.

arrow