logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.07.06 2016가합50414
구상금
Text

1. The Defendants jointly committed against the Plaintiff for KRW 294,398,325 and KRW 283,983,795 among them, from August 26, 2015, and October 10.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The plaintiff is a special corporation entrusted with industrial accident compensation insurance business by the Minister of Employment and Labor under the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act.

(2) B (hereinafter “victim”) is an employee belonging to the Cheong forest landscape construction (hereinafter “Cheong forest landscape construction”) and Defendant limited liability company (hereinafter “Defendant 1 1”) is a corporation established for the purpose of reinforced concrete construction business, soil construction business, etc., and Defendant A is a driver of the 3 excavation season (hereinafter “instant excavation season”).

(3) On November 16, 2012, the Cheonggyeong-do was awarded a contract for the project to create the Cheongan Natural Ecology Park in the area of the Cheongan-gun located in the area of the Cheongan-gun located in the Cheongan-gun located in the area of the Cheongan-gun located in the Cheongan-gun located in the area of the Cheongan-gun located in the area of the Sinan-gun located in the area of the Gunan-gun located in the area of the Republic of Korea, and the construction of the Donan-gun located in the area of the Saemangeum-gun located in the area of the Saemangeum-gun located in the area of the Republic of Korea.

B. The occurrence of the instant accident (1) around 10:00 on March 11, 2013, the victim conducted a survey to change the design of emulsa and landscaping works within the site for the creation of the emulsa ecological park in the area where the emulsa-gun, Mapo-gun, Mapo-gun, North

On the other hand, while Defendant A was performing the ground-breaking work for the pipe construction on the same day, he parked the ground-breaking machine of this case in a place where approximately 5 meters away from the victim and the victim. On the other hand, Defendant A left the ground-breaking work on the ground that the ground-breaking machine was cut to the victim and the victim did so (hereinafter “the instant accident”).

(2) Due to the instant accident, victims suffered injuries, such as the pelvise No. 1 in the pelle, spine damage, neebal dynassis, and neutronism.

C. The Plaintiff’s industrial accident compensation insurance payment is the case.

arrow