The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Defendant 1) misunderstanding of facts: (a) although there was a fact of deceiving the victim company as if the Defendant had suffered a traffic accident requiring long-term hospitalization on October 11, 2013, the Defendant was subject to a traffic accident on the said date; (b) however, there was an error of misconception of facts in the lower court that recognized the facts charged by deceiving the victim company as if the Defendant did not have suffered a traffic accident; (b) the lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

B. The Prosecutor’s sentence of the lower court is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. On October 11, 2013, the Defendant: (a) had two persons on board a vehicle at a speed of up to 50 km per hour on October 21, 2013, when driving the vehicle at a speed of 50 km; (b) in the opposite line, the Defendant got out of the center line and got out of the driver’s seat of the Defendant and the Defendant’s driver’s seat; (c) as a result, the Defendant was faced with the head of his windows and Hand and lost knife; and (d) the Defendant got out of the knife and the passengers died both.

‘The statement' is written.

However, according to the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, even though there was a considerable shock in light of the above circumstances, the defendant's vehicle was not destroyed or damaged only on the vehicle, and there was no trace of accidents, such as scatterings, around the scene of the accident (Evidence No. 137 pages), and there was no witness in light of the date and time and place, and there was no witness, and the defendant appeared to have passed around the surrounding area, and the defendant stated that he was too frightened due to the initial accident, and that he was no longer fright until he was able to frighten out (20 minutes of the evidence record, 339 pages), and that he reversed his statement that he was unable to see surrounding circumstances (Evidence No. 148, 339 pages), and that he was frighten.