beta
Text
The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The judgment of the court of first instance is in the judgment.
Reasons
1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the court of first instance is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the case where the judgment was used by the court of first instance as stated in paragraph (2).
2. Part 2 to 3 below the two pages, the Defendant B District Housing Association (hereinafter referred to as the “Defendant Association”) and the Defendant Association shall be collectively referred to as the “Defendant”.
Defendant C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Co., Ltd.”) shall be incorporated into “Co-Defendant C Co., Ltd. of the first instance trial” (hereinafter “C”) and “Defendant Co., Ltd.” shall be incorporated into “C” in its entirety.
7. A part from the 17th parallel, from 8th parallel to 9th parallel, a part from the 9th parallel parallel to 5th parallel, and a part from 16th parallel to 17th parallel parallel.
11. The loan contract for consumption under private law (“B”) in the form of a contract under private law shall be made in six parallels of 11.
114,692,980,000 each "114,683,980,000" shall be written with "114,683,980,000 won".
The 14th parallel 17 to 16th parallel 14th parallel 16th parallel 14th parallel 14th parallel as follows:
In full view of the following circumstances, as to whether the Plaintiff performed the advertising service equivalent to the advertising service price of this case, Gap’s evidence Nos. 10 through 29, 34 through 50, 54, 76, and 77 and the purport of the entire arguments, it is insufficient to acknowledge that the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff was that the Plaintiff performed the advertising service equivalent to the advertising service price of this case in addition to the advertising service price already received from the Defendant, and there is no other evidence to support otherwise.
In this case, it is argued that the total amount of advertising service is KRW 3,318,153,00 on the basis of the above detailed statement of advertising transaction.
However, the content of the advertisement of this case is.