The defendant shall be innocent.

1. On February 2, 2010, the summary of the facts charged in the instant case, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “If he pays the drinking value from the Fju on January 9, 2010 to 3.2 million won in cash, he would have cancelled the previous card 3.9 million won.”

However, the fact is that 3.9 million won has already been paid by the credit card company, so even if 3.2 million won has been paid by the victim, there was no intention or ability to cancel the credit card settlement.

Nevertheless, the Defendant received 3.2 million won in cash from the victim's occupation.

Accordingly, the defendant deceivings the victim and acquired property.

2. The defendant's assertion that although the defendant requested the revocation of the approval on the payment by credit card, he tried to return the money received from the victim on the wind that does not have been revoked due to the expiration of the period, and he did not intend to deduct the amount of credit card payment from the victim in the process.

3. Review of the records reveals the following facts. A.

The defendant's business method is working in F-jun and other various main points, and the customer is in charge of paying the drinking value from the customer, and the customer is in charge of paying the drinking value. If the customer drinks on credit, the customer is individually contacted to the customer and directly receiving the credit value in cash.

B. From around three years before the date of occurrence of the case, the Defendant knew with the victim who was a main guest, and the victim worked as the head of the attorney G law office, while working as the head of the attorney G law office, and dysing out several drinkings at the main points where the Defendant works with the attorney, etc.

C. On January 9, 2010, the victim drank alcohol in the F entertainment tavern where the defendant works together with G, and 3,900.