beta
Text
[Defendant A] Defendant A’s imprisonment with prison labor for one month for a crime of paragraph (1) of the attached Table 3 of the List of Offenses No. 3 as indicated in Defendant A’s decision.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On June 2, 2016, Defendant A was sentenced to 8 months of imprisonment with prison labor for special larceny, 2 years of suspended execution, and 3 years of imprisonment with prison labor for the same offense in the same court on October 20, 2016, and the decision was finalized on October 28, 2016.
"2017 Highest 166"
1. On December 14, 2016, at around 04:50 on December 14, 2016, the Defendants: (a) used the gap in the “F” restaurant operated by the victim E in south-gu, Nam-gu, and caused the damage to the victim; (b) Defendant B, by taking advantage of the gap in the surveillance of the victim’s negligence; (c) Defendant A, by taking advantage of the male toilet windows, has 50,000 won in cash owned by the victim and stolen them, which had been stored in the safe inside the kitchen, and had been invaded upon the inside the kitchen; and (d) as indicated in the attached Table Nos. 1 through 9, 2016, 1,000 won in total and nine times in the market price owned by the victims by the same method during nine times from the patrol to December 2, 2016.
As a result, the defendants stolen the property owned by the victims jointly.
2. The Defendants attempted to larceny goods owned by the victims on three occasions from the beginning point 03:00 to the beginning point 05:00 on December 2016, 2016 to the end of the “I” restaurant operated by the victim H of the victim H in the south-gu G at the port, and caused the damage to the victim, thereby neglecting surveillance, Defendant B’s network around the scene. Defendant A opened a window on the entrance where the correction was not made, and attempted to steal the victim’s property by intrusion into that door, but did not bring about the intent, as indicated in the List (1) Nos. 10 to 12 of the Attached Crimes List No. 10 to 2016, the Defendants attempted to steal the goods owned by the victims on three occasions in total from the point of time to December 2016 to the point of time, but did not have attempted to commit such a crime.
Accordingly, the Defendants are the defendants.