A defendant shall be punished by August.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On April 29, 2016, at around 22:35, the Defendant: (a) declared on the front of the window B of Changwon-si, 112, and asked the personal information of the Defendant, the security guards affiliated with the police box C of the Changwon Police Station of the Changwon Police Station of the Changwon, who called out after receiving a report of 112 that there was a person who was in a disturbance to revoke the owner on the front of the window B, and (b) stated that “C. Bas shall be assigned to the Defendant,” and that “C. Bas shall be assigned to the Defendant,” and that the Defendant took part in the clothes and shoulder of E

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning 112 report handling duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (unfavorable circumstances) of the suspended sentence (Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act) is that a crime of violence committed against a police officer in the course of performing official duties is inferior to the nature of the crime, there are several criminal records of violence, and the fact that there are criminal records of the suspended sentence [ favorable circumstances] that the criminal records of the suspended sentence were prior to ten years, reflects the fact that the criminal records of the suspended sentence