logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.06.08 2016나19975
대여금
Text

1.The judgment of the first instance shall be modified as follows:

The defendant shall be within the scope of the property inherited from the network E.

Reasons

1. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 7 as to the cause of the claim, the plaintiff loaned KRW 90,000,00 to Eul on August 7, 2006, ② The plaintiff is jointly and severally liable to the plaintiff for the debt of KRW 90,00,000 and overdue interest of KRW 36,20,000 (hereinafter "loan debt of this case") with the plaintiff on the premise that Eul bears the obligation of KRW 126,20,000 (hereinafter "loan debt of this case"), Eul is jointly and severally liable to pay the debt of this case to the plaintiff in installments, KRW 30,00,00, KRW 200, KRW 200, KRW 200, KRW 200, KRW 60, KRW 200, KRW 60, KRW 37,000, KRW 20, KRW 60, KRW 60,000 inheritance shares of the deceased's husband of this case.

2. Judgment on the defendant's assertion

A. The Defendant, in succeeding the network E’s property, was tried to grant a limited approval by the court, and the Defendant asserts to the effect that the Defendant is not liable for the joint and several liability of the instant loan obligations against the Plaintiff. Therefore, in full view of the purport of the entire pleadings (including these facts in the court) in the statement No. 6, the Defendant, as the deceased’s heir, is the Cheongju District Court 2014Mo206.

arrow