beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The defendant is driving the two or more different vehicles, while the victim C (ma, 25 years old) drives a D bus.
On March 26, 2020, at around 06:45, the Defendant was driving ahead of the national theater of 59 national theater, Jung-gu, Seoul, Jung-gu, Seoul, with one lane in the direction of Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu, Seoul, along the same direction, and the victim who was driving along the two lanes in the same direction changed the two lanes in front of the defendant's driving vehicle in the same direction, threatened the center line with the center line, obstructed the course by reducing the sudden speed of the victim and continuously interfere with the course of the victim's moving in the direction of approximately 1.5 KK.
In this respect, the defendant threatened the victim by taking advantage of the van, which is a dangerous object.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement to C by the police;
1. The Defendant asserts that there was no threat to the victim by using his/her own vehicle, such as a video and other related data, as described in the facts charged.
However, the following circumstances revealed by the evidence of the judgment, i.e., ① the defendant's bus at the time of the incident was changed in front of the bus of the victim, and the defendant obstructed the defendant's way to reduce his own speed by leaving the center line in front of the bus of the victim, and ② the defendant has obstructed the course by changing the bus of the victim into the same lane whenever the bus of the victim is changed to the same lane, and even thereafter, the defendant interfered with the course of reducing the speed by reducing the speed. After all times, the two lanes have been changed into one lane, and eventually, the victim has obstructed the bus front of the victim by blocking the bus of the victim, and ③ the victim has been seriously threatened with the victim's retaliation, and the victim stated at the investigative agency that "the victim was frightd with the victim's retaliation, and there was a net simple 3 to 4 times the date of the accident," and the defendant has expressed several lanes with the intent to threaten the victim.