1. Between the Defendant and D, the claim for the return of the lease deposit as specified in attached Form 1 and the claim for the return of the lease deposit as specified in attached Form 2 around October 201.

On December 2009, the Plaintiff and D began to jointly engage in wholesale business, such as scrap iron, and the removal business (hereinafter “instant business”) at the same place, by leasing approximately KRW 660 square meters in the amount of KRW 1,779 square meters in the area of KRW 1,779 square meters in the Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Daegu.

On November 19, 2010, the Plaintiff and D left part of the removal work from H Co., Ltd. at the site of the construction for the expansion of factories in the G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G, and left I with the steel-frame cutting work. The Plaintiff and D suffered injury by falling into the floor and losing 100% of the labor ability due to acute thromatic blood transfusion, etc.

(hereinafter referred to as “related accident.” On November 23, 2010, the Plaintiff and D had the business registered as the business owner of D, Defendant B, who had been a dynamics of D, retroactively from November 3, 2010, prior to the relevant accident, and accordingly, the new lease contract for the lessee of the instant site was drafted as of December 20, 2010.

On April 10, 201, the Plaintiff and D terminated the agreement on the partnership business, and distributed 43,300,000 won, half of the appraised value of J's remaining assets, which is 86,660,000 won. However, D agreed to pay 43,330,000 won to the Plaintiff instead of continuously operating J, and also be responsible for the relevant accidents.

Accordingly, the Plaintiff received the above settlement amount from D around that time.

The representative of the instant workplace was changed from Defendant B to Plaintiff, but D continued to operate the instant workplace, including the lease deposit return claim and corporeal movables, around October 201, 201, after the said settlement agreement was reached and around April 11, 201, a new business registration was made in the name of Defendant B in the name of the Plaintiff, instead of the business registration under the Plaintiff’s name. D transferred the instant workplace to Defendant B, including the lease deposit return claim and corporeal movables.

(hereinafter “instant transfer act”). D At the time, there is no particular property.