A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On August 19, 2016, the Defendant: (a) reported by the host on the road in front of C, which was located in B on August 18:50 on August 19, 2016, that the host on the road in front of C, would have enjoyed on the roadside; and (b) a slope E, a police box affiliated with the wooden Police Station D police box called out, and a policeman F, to the Defendant.

Modwards, Risk Elimination도요

The Defendant’s body, which caused the Defendant’s body, was bucked twice, and the left part of E’s buckbucks was walked on three occasions, and the F prevented the Defendant, and the Defendant was bucked on two occasions by drinking the left part of the F’s right shoulder and the bucks part of the bucks.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on 112 reported dispatch duty.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to E, F, and G;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Taking into account the following factors: (a) the confession and reflection of the reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act for the observation of protection and observation; (b) there is no record of being sentenced to a fine or heavier punishment for the same kind of crime; (c) contingent crimes; and (d) police officers who are the subject of the instant crime have not