The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. misunderstanding of facts (violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a violation of the same Act (a collective action, deadly weapon, etc.)) recognizes the fact that the defendant was guilty of having caused the injury to the victim due to the fact that the defendant was unable to meet the victim, but the defendant was not guilty of having committed an injury to the victim, and there was no fact that the defendant inflicted an injury on the victim by using the scam scam scam, etc., and the defendant was not guilty of having committed an injury to the victim by carrying dangerous articles. However, the judgment of the court below which found the defendant guilty of having violated the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a

B. The lower court’s sentence on the Defendant of unreasonable sentencing (two years of suspended sentence in one year and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. 1) The Defendant consistently stated from the investigative agency to this court that the Defendant was suffering from scam and scam. However, the Defendant denied the fact that the scam was injured by the victim, or the Defendant was not injured by the scam with the scam scam scam scam scam scam scam scam. 2). In addition to the various circumstances stated in the reasoning of the judgment by the court below, the following circumstances acknowledged by the records of this case are consistent with the records of this case: ① the victim stated consistently from the investigative agency to this court that “the Defendant was scam scam scam scam and scam scam scam scam scam and scam scam scam scam scam scam scam scam scam scam scam scam scam scam.