Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

At around 01:00 on June 22, 2015, the Defendant, at the 'E located on the first floor underground of Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D, on the ground that the victim F(36 years of age) is bad, and on the ground that the victim F(36 years of age) is bad, the Defendant continued to put the victim F with the beer’s disease, which is a dangerous object in the table.

In this respect, the defendant carried dangerous objects and assaulted the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Application of the respective legal statements of witness C and F to the Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 261 of the Criminal Act and Articles 261 and 260 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of fines concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order are as follows: (a) the background and content of the instant crime; (b) the degree of damage; (c) the risk of the instant crime; and (d) the fact that the damage was not agreed with the victim and the damage was not recovered; (d) the primary crime was the first crime; and (e) the Defendant’s age, career, health status;

The acquittal portion

1. Around 01:00 on June 22, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 01:0, at the main point of “E located on the 1st underground floor of Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D’E; (b) the Defendant, as indicated in the facts constituting the offense in the judgment, carried out the Victim C (year 31) toward F by taking advantage of beer’s disease, which is a dangerous object in the table table as indicated in the judgment; and (c) the victim C (year 31) who was adjacent thereto, was able

In this respect, the defendant carried dangerous objects and assaulted the victim.

2. The judgment is based on the direct evidence of this part of the facts charged C, F’s investigation agency and this court’s statement. Even according to each of the above statements, it can only be acknowledged that the Defendant, who discovered F, once display the beer’s disease to F, would have been in the hands by hand, and that C would have been in the state of lighting within the main point at the time.