A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2014. 4. 12 23:40경 의정부시 C 피해자 D(61세)가 밴드마스터로 일하고 있는 E 주점에서, 일행들과 술을 마시던 중 피해자가 신청곡을 틀어주지 않는다는 이유로 테이블에 있던 위험한 물건인 빈 맥주병을 피해자를 향해 던져 맥주병이 건반에 맞고 튕기면서 피해자의 이마 부위에 맞히어 이마 부위가 찢어지게 하였다.

In this respect, the defendant carried dangerous objects and carried them for about 14 days, which requires medical treatment to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. Each police statement made to D, F, and G;

1. Each photograph (field and the wife of the victim);

1. Application of investigation reports (verification of devices adjacent to the site) Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 3 (1) and Article 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Mitigation of discretionary mitigation under Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act ( Taking into account the following favorable circumstances:

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the following favorable circumstances, etc.):

1. Determination as to the defendant's assertion on probation, community service order and order to attend lecture, Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Probation Act

1. First, the Defendant asserts that, at the time of committing the instant crime, the instant crime was not committed against the victim, but was committed against the victim, and that there was no intention to commit the instant crime, since it was merely committed with microphones around the victim’s wife.

그러나 피고인이 이 사건 범행 당시 맥주병을 던지게 된 동기 및 전후경위, 이에 부합하는 피해자의 진술과 목격자의 진술 등을 종합해 보면, 피고인은 이 사건 범행 당시 이 사건 공소사실 기재와 같은 이유로 화가 나 피해자를 향하여 맥주병을 던졌는데, 처음에는 피해자가 연주하고 있던 건반악기에 맞았던 맥주병이 강하게 튕겨 나가면서...