Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On July 8, 2014, at around 09:30, the Defendant driven DST5 car and proceeded along the two-lanes of the two-lane road in front of the Gangseo-gu Seoul National Bank, Gangseo-gu, Seoul National Bank, along the two-lanes. On July 8, 2014, the Defendant did not turn on the direction direction direction, etc. for the victim E. (the age of 38) driving while driving the first-lane, and kid itself.

Accordingly, the victim of play driven by the defendant's direction towards the direction of the vehicle of the defendant, and the victim was overtaking the defendant's vehicle to the left side to avoid this, and the victim continued to proceed bypassing it to the right side of the road.

The Defendant, who was misunderstanding that the victim was partly kid in the future of his own vehicle, threatened the victim with the above SM5 car, which is a dangerous object by driving away the victim's vehicle, with the right right side of the victim, and continuously threatened the victim with the above SM5 car driving system by continuously blocking the victim's vehicle in front of the vehicle.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and threatened the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. The court shall deny the facts charged by asserting that the defendant's motion picture [the counsel shall only act in accordance with the victim's vehicle and did not have any criminal intent of intimidation in order to take the victim who had been illegally and recklessly driven (the defendant's desire to drive the defendant illegally and unafly (the defendant's improper round-up through a sudden overtaking, an improper round-up as a retaliation, and a speed-down after a retaliation) at the time). However, the court shall deny the application of the law by asserting that the victim was forced by using the victim's vehicle and did not have any criminal intent of intimidation. However, there is no evidence to acknowledge that the victim was illegal or unafly driven with the video of the black b

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 284 and 283 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment.

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which provides for an order of provisional payment.