Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On December 22, 2015, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (drinking) driven B rocketing car with approximately 7km alcohol concentration of 0.104% at the section of about 7km from the 143 Yando to the 205-ropary road from the 143 Yando to the west-si Jeju Jeju Jeju Jeju Jeju Jeju Jeju Jeju Gyeongpo District, the Gyeongpo-si Jeju Gyeongpo District Office of Jeju, the 2015 Yando.
2. On December 22, 2015, the Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (hereinafter “Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents”) driven the said car under the influence of alcohol content of 0.104% among blood transfusions on December 22, 2015, while driving the said car under the influence of alcohol content of 0.104%, and driving the car directly along the two-lanes of the two-lanes in front of the 205-lane Dog Jeju Jeju Jeju Jeju High District Office (hereinafter “Seoul High District Office”), facing the two-lanes in
In such cases, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle shall not drive the motor vehicle at a speed or in such a manner as to inflict any danger and injury on others according to the road traffic conditions and the structure and performance of the motor vehicle, and has a duty of care to prevent accidents by reporting the front side and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right of the motor vehicle.
Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and caused the back part of the DNA-learning passenger car which was driven by the victim C (29) who was waiting for the signal in the front section by negligence, and caused the shock to the front part of the said car.
As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as salt, tensions, etc. in need of approximately two weeks of medical treatment due to such occupational negligence.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;
1. C’s statement;
1. On-site photographs;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes;
1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents under the relevant Act concerning criminal facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, Article 148-2 (2) 2 of the Road Traffic Act, and Article 44 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (the point of driving under influence of alcohol) concerning criminal facts;
1. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment;