The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is as follows: (a) the victim D, the owner of the instant water source, allowed the Defendant to use only one column of the water source building; and (b) the Defendant did not permit the Defendant to continue to use the remainder in addition to temporary use; and (c) the Defendant, the manager of the entire water source of this case

It constitutes a crime of non-compliance with the Gu's refusal to leave.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which acquitted the charged facts of this case is erroneous.

2. The judgment of the court below is based on the evidence duly adopted and examined, i.e., the following circumstances acknowledged by the court below, i., ① the defendant and his family members (spouse and children) agreed with the victim to the effect that "the defendant resided in the large room of the water sources of this case without setting a deadline and manage the building and engage in religious activities." The director of the water sources of this case around September 2013. ② the victim was living separately in the neighboring residential building that is not the water sources of this case. ③ The defendant and his family members had not been able to use other parts such as the kitchen of the water sources of this case. ③ In order to lead a daily life, the defendant and his family members were living for several months. ④ The victim demanded that the water sources of this case be transferred to the defendant around December 2013, the victim was living in the living room of the water sources of this case, and the defendant's and his family members were not able to use other parts such as the kitchen of this case.