1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. Determination on the cause of the claim

A. There is no dispute between the parties, or comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments in Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2 and Eul evidence Nos. 2-1, the plaintiff is an organization composed of the occupants to conduct the management business, etc. of the apartment of Yeongdeungpo-gu, Young-si. The defendant leased the apartment of this case from the owner (hereinafter "former owner") of the above Am. 110 Dong 402 (hereinafter "the apartment of this case") and resided in the apartment of this case until January 12, 2015. The auction procedure for the apartment of this case was conducted during the period in which the defendant resided in the apartment of this case. The plaintiff's name in the above auction procedure was awarded a successful bid for the apartment of this case and paid the price in full, but the defendant refused to transfer the apartment of this case to the purchaser through the litigation procedure, and the purchaser did not submit any dispute between the court and the court and the auction procedure of this case, and the parties to this auction procedure, and it could be acknowledged as the whole.

The Defendant, on January 12, 2015, went to a different place from the apartment of this case. However, the former owner’s animals kept in custody upon the request of the former owner were left to the apartment of this case. As such, the buyer was delivered the apartment of this case through compulsory execution on January 27, 2015, based on the executive title on the delivery of the apartment of this case.