All appeals filed by the prosecutor against the Defendants are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In light of the fact that there is credibility in the statement of victim E (not guilty part) and the injury part of the medical certificate of injury coincide with the details of the victim’s damage, the lower court found the Defendant not guilty of this part of the facts charged, even if the facts charged are fully recognized, is erroneous or erroneous in the misapprehension of legal doctrine.

B. The sentence of the lower judgment against the Defendants (the part on the charge of unfair sentencing) (the imprisonment with prison labor for the Defendants B and the suspension of execution for the six months, the imprisonment with prison labor for the Defendants A and the suspension of execution for the two years

2. Determination

A. As to the assertion of misunderstanding of facts or misapprehension of legal principles, the Defendants of this part of the facts charged: (a) around 22:00 on December 5, 201, in the process of finding out a contract and receipt possessed by the victim under the same circumstance as the facts stated in the judgment at the house of the victim E in Goyang-gu, Goyang-gu; (b) Defendant B was sealed with the victim by putting the victim’s scarf; and (c) Defendant A was milling the victim’s arms and fingers for about 21 days by jointly taking advantage of the victim’s scarf; and (b) Defendant A tried to inflict injury on the victim, such as salt and tension, which requires treatment for about 21 days in the process of delivering the victim’s saf and the receipt, etc.; (c) the Defendants merely intended to use the saf and the receipt, etc. at the victim’s investigative agency and the court; (d) in the course of the investigation process, the Defendants merely intended to return the victim’s s saf and the receipt.