1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. Determination as to the cause of claim

A. The facts of recognition 1) From July 13, 1992 to July 13, 1992, D, the representative director of the Defendant, was engaged in the business of manufacturing electronic parts and automobile parts in F at Kimhae-si, and was closed on December 31, 2012. Since then D, the Defendant was established, and the Defendant is the manufacturer of automobile parts that are eight regular employees. (2) On May 7, 2007, Plaintiff B was employed in E and retired from office on November 30, 201, while serving as a production employee, and Plaintiff A was employed in E on June 1, 2009 and retired from office on August 31, 2013.

3) The Plaintiffs were working hours from 8:30 to 17:30, and worked for 8 hours a day from ordinary Saturdays to Saturdays, and worked for 2.5 hours a week at least 4 times a week. 4) The monthly salary is KRW 2 million a time when Plaintiff B retires, and the monthly salary of Plaintiff A was KRW 1.7 million a day in 2013.

5) 한편 피고 대표이사 D은 2014. 9. 15. 창원지방법원으로부터 ‘원고 A에 대하여 퇴직금 7,075,907원 7,075,907원[≒ (3개월간 임금총액 5,100,000원 ÷ 퇴직일 이전 3개월간 총일수 92일) × 30일 × (2009. 6. 1.부터 2013. 8. 31.까지 재직일수 1553일 ÷ 365일), 원 미만 버림] , 원고 B에 대하여 7,044,707원 7,044,707원[= {(3개월간 임금총액 6,000,000원 ÷ 퇴직일 이전 3개월간 총일수 91일) × 30일 × (2007. 5. 7.부터 2011. 11. 30.까지 재직일수 1669일 ÷ 365일)} - 2,000,000원] 을 지급기일 연장에 관한 합의 없이 퇴직일로부터 14일 이내에 지급하지 아니하였다’는 범죄사실에 대하여 근로자 퇴직급여보장법 위반죄로 벌금 150만원의 약식명령을 발령받았고, 정식재판을 청구하였다가 취하하여 벌금형이 확정되었다. 【인정근거】다툼 없음, 갑 1, 3, 을 1, 2, 3, 4, 5(가지번호 있는 것은 가지번호 포함, 이하 같다

each entry, the purport of the whole pleading

B. According to the facts of the above recognition, the defendant and E are only named.