logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2019. 01. 31. 선고 2018두62560 판결
(심리불속행) 3층을 제외한 나머지 부분은 소득세법상 양도소득세 비과세대상으로 규정하고 있는 1세대 1주택에서 언급하는 주택으로 볼 수 없음[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court-2018-Nu-47136 ( October 19, 2018)

Title

(ps) The remainder except for three floors shall not be considered as a house referred to in one house for one household, which is subject to the exemption of capital gains tax under the Income Tax Act.

Summary

(C) In light of the purpose of legislation of the non-taxation system on one house for one household, it cannot be deemed that it belongs to the category of housing referred to in the subject requirement in light of the purpose of legislation of the non-taxation system on one house for one household, since it has the structure and function of private childcare centers, which are facilities for the elderly and children belonging to education and welfare facility group under the Building Act, and has been used as private childcare centers.

Related statutes

Article 89 of the former Income Tax Act

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but it is clear that the allegation in the grounds of appeal by appellant constitutes Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure of Appeal and therefore, the appeal is dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the above Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by

arrow