[Defendant A] The defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive against Defendant A.

Punishment of the crime

"200 Highest 1116"

1. At around 18:30 on February 19, 2020, Defendant A interfered with the business, at the “E” restaurant operated by the victim D in Yangsan-si, Defendant A: (a) prevented the victim from engaging in an act of disturbance in daily and large interest rates; (b) prevented the victim from doing so; and (c) opened a door to the victim; (d) let the victim scam scam, scam, scam, and scam, open the door to the victim; and (e) scam scam, scam, and scam, scambling the disturbance for about 2 hours, such as scambling the disturbance, and making the customer scam in the said restaurant.

Accordingly, the suspect interfered with the victim's restaurant business by force.

2. On October 21, 2020, Defendant A, at the parking lot of the “G police box” located in the F of Yangsan City, around 21:07, in relation to the instant case of obstruction of the performance of official duties, was carrying out patrols at H’s recommendation of the police officer belonging to the Yangsan Police Station G police box dispatched pursuant to the notification of 112, and continuously carried out the patrols at the back seat, and notified that the above H may be punished in the event that the above H continuously carried out the act of disturbance while guiding the Defendant to get out of the said parking lot and return back to the her seat, and the above H may be punished in the event that the Defendant continued to carry out the act of disturbance. This, even though police officers assigned to the police box, assaulted the left side of the H’s face while continuously booming.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in regard to the handling of 112 reported cases.

"200 Highest 2361"

3. Defendant A expressed on March 21, 2020 on the ground that at the “K” restaurant operated by the victim J in Yangsan-si on the ground that the victim did not promptly leave the taxi, and Defendant A expressed the victim’s desire to “a sprinke when the victim was young on the sprink, walth, walth, walth, walth, walth, walth, walth, and old day,” and Defendant B expressed the victim’s desire to “a sprinke when he was young on the old day,” and Defendant B expressed the above Defendant A’s riot.