Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 30,000,000 to the Plaintiffs and 20% per annum from October 18, 2014 to September 30, 2015, respectively.
Reasons
A. The instant inspection is deemed to be a 2-story cultural and assembly facility of the 2nd floor and the 2nd floor and 180 square meters (hereinafter “the instant inspection”) (hereinafter “the 2nd floor”).
corporation is jointly owned.
B. On August 31, 2012, the Plaintiffs and the Defendant concluded a lease agreement with the Plaintiffs stipulating that the instant temple shall be leased KRW 30 million as the lease deposit, and that the remainder KRW 20 million shall be paid in December 10, 2012, “from September 1, 2012 to December 12, 201,” “12 months from September 1, 2012,” and “1.5 million won” as the monthly rent.
C. At the time of concluding the above lease agreement, the Plaintiffs and the Defendant attached the following special terms:
1) Changju’s plaques and his family members’ plaques shall be kept in lifelong free of charge. 2) Deposit 30 million won as pre-sale deposit. In the event that the Plaintiffs did not conclude a sales contract, a double of the down payment shall be repaid to the Defendant, and if the Defendant did not conclude a sales contract, the down payment shall be paid to the Plaintiff.
* Conclusion of a sales contract by paying 690 million won on August 30, 2013 and paying 690 million won.
3) (Bodmons, and charnels) The Defendant shall take over the existing plaques, barrackss, and charnels as at the time of entering into a contract, and shall not damage the plaques, statues, etc., and shall obtain prior approval from the Plaintiffs in writing at the time of selling a charnel house.
Provided, That when ordering, it shall be restored to the original state by the designated date of the plaintiffs.
If the defendant fails to perform this, the plaintiffs act on behalf of the plaintiffs and collect the restoration expenses from the defendant.
The Defendant paid a down payment of KRW 10 million to the Plaintiffs and received the instant inspection in accordance with the said lease agreement. After that, the Defendant did not pay the instant inspection at all until November 2012, and did not pay the deposit amount of KRW 20 million to be paid on December 10, 2012.
Accordingly, on November 6, 2012 and December 13, 2012, the Plaintiffs concluded the said lease agreement on the grounds of the delay in rent, etc. by sending the mail verifying the content to the Defendant via two times.