1. All appeals by the defendant against the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

purport, purport, and.

A. The instant inspection is jointly owned by 1/2 shares of 180 square meters (hereinafter “instant inspection”).

B. On August 31, 2012, the Plaintiffs and the Defendant concluded a lease agreement (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”) with the Plaintiffs setting forth KRW 30,000,000 for the instant temple (a contract deposit of KRW 10,000,000 for KRW 200,000 for the remainder payment at the time of a contract) and the lease term of KRW 1,50,000 for the rent from September 1, 2012 to August 31, 2013 (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”).

C. The Plaintiffs and the Defendant agreed on the following special terms at the time of entering into the instant lease agreement:

1) Changju’s plaques and his family members’ plaques are kept in lifelong free of charge. 2) The deposit amount of KRW 30,000,000 shall be the contract deposit for sale and purchase; where the Plaintiffs did not enter into a sales contract, the amount of the down payment shall be repaid to the Defendant; and where the Defendant did not enter into a sales contract, the down payment shall be paid to the Plaintiff.

* It pays 690,000,000 won on August 30, 2013 and concludes a sales contract.

3) (Bodmons, and charnels) The Defendant shall take over the existing plaques, portraits, and charnels at the time of entering into a contract, and shall not damage the plaques, portraits, etc., and shall obtain the Plaintiffs’ prior approval in writing at the time of selling a charnel house.

Provided, That when ordering, it shall be restored to the original state by the designated date of the plaintiffs.

If the defendant fails to perform this, the plaintiffs act on behalf of the plaintiffs and collect the restoration expenses from the defendant.

The Defendant paid the Plaintiffs a down payment of KRW 10,000,000 among the lease deposit and received the instant temple in accordance with the above lease agreement. After that, the Defendant did not entirely pay the monthly rent from November 2012, and did not pay the remainder of the lease deposit to be paid on December 10, 2012, which was agreed to be paid on December 10, 2012.

Accordingly, the plaintiffs sent content-certified mail to the defendant on November 6, 2012 and December 13, 2012.