1. The judgment of the court of first instance is modified as follows.

The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff KRW 10,000,000 and the defendant shall pay to the plaintiff on August 2015.

1. The reasoning for the court’s judgment on this part of the underlying facts is as follows, and this part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is identical to that of the corresponding part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance (two to three-eight pages), and thus, this part is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The following shall be added to three pages of the judgment of the first instance. "The noise has occurred":

On June 19, 2015, Defendant 2 obstructed Plaintiff’s golf course operation by installing a light flag in front of the instant golf course, referring to a large amount of 3: 1: From 20:0 on July 15, 2015 to 3: 1:00 on May 20, 2015, Defendant 2: from 1:00 to 25:0 on July 15, 2015, Defendant left 1:3:00 on the instant golf course to 1:5:0 on the road, “FT 4.0 billion won will be restored to its original state, and 4:0 billion won will be paid.” From 1:0 on the instant golf course, Defendant 2:00 on July 10, 2015 to 1:5:00 on the instant golf course, and 1:00 on July 10, 2015 to 1:5:6:0 on the instant golf course, and 1:6:000 on the road.

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiff's assertion 1 is operated by the defendant.