The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is that the defendant's act is self-defense when he/she takes face of the complainant one time at a level of self-defense and defending a group from many persons.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case is erroneous and erroneous.

2. In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly admitted and investigated by the court below, the defendant's act as stated in the facts charged of this case cannot be deemed as self-defense, and thus, the defendant's assertion is not accepted.

A. The victim B stated in the investigative agency that "I continue to have a big speech while getting on the subway. I look at the situation, I reported that I will come to the horses to foreign women, and another I would like to witness in the subway. Among them, I put I am to the two I am among them, and asked I am to put I am to this end, and among them I am I am am to the foreigner, I am am to the am I am I am to the am I am. I am to the am we am."

(b) C, which has observed the situation at the time and has taken a video image, has continued to be an English language for a foreign woman.

It is difficult for foreign women to be able to see, “Ilman???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

Before Shos, Shos did not start subways due to their own trial costs, and students (victims) who received white clothes were trying to see Adoz. At that time, Adoz (Defendants) who used violence is drinking the face of male students.