The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the lower court (four months of imprisonment) on the summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. The lower court sentenced the Defendant to four months of imprisonment, taking into account the circumstances favorable to the Defendant, favorable to the Defendant, and the sentencing guidelines recommended by the Supreme Court sentencing committee.

The judgment of the court below exceeded the reasonable bounds of discretion when comprehensively taking into account the following: (a) the conditions for sentencing in the trial; and (b) the fact that no agreement has been reached with the victim until now; (c) the applicable sentences; and (d) the sentencing guidelines;

There is no circumstance that it is deemed unfair to maintain the judgment of the court below as it is or that the judgment of the court below is unfair.

In addition, even in full view of the circumstances and results of the instant crime, Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, etc., the sentence of the lower court is appropriate, and it is not deemed unfair because it is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit.