The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the lower court (four months of imprisonment) on the summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. The lower court sentenced the Defendant to four months of imprisonment, taking into account the circumstances favorable to the Defendant, favorable to the Defendant, and the sentencing guidelines recommended by the Supreme Court sentencing committee.

In full view of the fact that the sentencing of the court below exceeded the reasonable bounds of its discretion when comprehensively taking into account the matters that are the conditions for the sentencing in the trial, in particular, the fact that the crime of this case was committed during the period of repeated crime due to the same kind of crime, the applicable sentences, and the sentencing guidelines

There is no circumstance that it is deemed unfair to maintain the judgment of the court below as it is or that the judgment of the court below is unfair.

In addition, even in full view of the circumstances and results of the instant crime, Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, etc., the sentence of the lower court is appropriate, and it is not deemed unfair because it is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit.