beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
Seized evidence subparagraph 1 shall be forfeited from the accused.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The defendant had opened a door of a vehicle parked at night, and had the mind to steal the articles in the vehicle.
On May 11, 2015, the Defendant: around 01:53, on the road in front of Thai City, the Defendant: (a) opened a door in a way that the gallon vehicle, which is parked on the road in front of Thai City, can cut off the stallon vehicle in a stallon cresh of the driver’s seat, by cutting off the stallon vehicle into a locking device; (b) laid down the stallon; and (c) stolen the 2nd of tobacco amounting to KRW 30,000, a cash owned by the victim, and KRW 9,000.
From that time until June 26, 2015, the Defendant stolen or attempted another’s property, such as the list of crimes in the annexed sheet, four times from that time, from that time to that time.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Each statement of F, G, D, and H;
1. Application of statutes on site photographs, records of seizure, and CCTV verification;
1. Articles 329 and 342 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;
1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;
1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Confiscation Criminal Act / [Scope of Recommendation] Where the mitigated area (general larceny in April to October) (special mitigation) (special mitigation) [Article 48(1)1 of the Confiscation Criminal Act / [Article 48(2) of the Confiscation Criminal Act / [Article 48] mitigated area (Article 4-10 months) / [Article 4] / The amount of damage is not more than the amount of damage, and there has been no history of having been sentenced to the same kind of crime for not less than 10 years, but the defendant has been sentenced to the same kind of crime in the past, but there is a history of having been sentenced to criminal punishment for the same kind of crime in the past, and it seems that the life under detention for a certain period of time is essential for the improvement of character and behavior as a repeated crime, and the defendant's age, character