logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울가정법원 2015. 8. 31.자 2015즈기877 결정
[이행명령][미간행]
Applicant

Applicant

Respondent

Respondent

Text

The respondent is a performance of the obligation under the conciliation protocol in the case, including the case of divorce 2006da89759, and the respondent pays 100,000,000 won out of the unpaid division of property to the applicant as of October 15 through January 2016.

Reasons

Inasmuch as the application of this case is well-grounded, it is decided as per Disposition by Article 64 of the Family Litigation Act (However, even if the scope of the decision of this case is limited as it does not per se affect the obligation under substantive law, the obligation of the respondent is not extinguished even if the scope of the decision of this case is limited. Thus, the respondent shall be given an appropriate amount for ordering

Judges Kim Tae-tae

A State: A person who violates this order without any justifiable reason may be punished by a fine for negligence not exceeding one million won, and when the obligation to make a periodical payment of money is not fulfilled for not less than 3 years, the person may be punished by detention within the limit of 30 days, and if the person fails to perform the obligation to deliver an infant and fails to perform the obligation within 30 days, the person may be punished by detention within the limit of 30 days.

arrow