Applicant

Respondent

The respondent is a performance of the obligation based on the conciliation protocol of the case, including the Seoul Family Court 2006Ddan89759, and the respondent pays 100,000,000 won out of the unpaid division of property to the applicant on the 15th of each month from October 2015 to January 2016.

Inasmuch as the application of this case is well-grounded, it is decided as per Disposition by Article 64 of the Family Litigation Act (However, even if the scope of the decision of this case is limited as it does not per se affect the obligation under substantive law, the obligation of the respondent is not extinguished even if the scope of the decision of this case is limited. Thus, the respondent shall be given an appropriate amount for ordering

Judges Kim Tae-tae

A State: A person who violates this order without any justifiable reason may be punished by a fine for negligence not exceeding one million won, and when a person fails to perform his/her duty of periodic payment of money for three or more years, he/she may be punished by detention within the limit of 30 days, and if he/she fails to perform his/her duty of delivery within 30 days, he/she may be punished by detention within the limit of 30 days.